I
spent a great deal of my HR career working in employee relations. People continue to fascinate me and I'm
amazed at what I continue to learn.
Consider the following:
Two
employees were caught drinking a six-pack of beer during their meal break in a
van parked in the company parking lot.
The company had a clear policy regarding the consumption of alcohol on
the premises. One of the employees
had a long tenure with the company along with a long history of disciplinary
actions. If discipline, which
comes from the word disciple, means to teach, he hadn’t learned anything. He did not make an attempt to change
his behavior despite the company’s efforts to help. The second employee had a shorter tenure, two to three
years. This was his first policy
violation. The first employee was
terminated, but the second was suspended without pay for five days. When the first employee cried foul, we
only had to produce his record which showed that the company had tried to work
with him over the years.
Managing
employees is an art, not a science.
More importantly, it’s not a sport or a game. What doesn’t work is an approach or “algorithm” that shows
if this happens, than that is the action you have to take, or as someone once
asked me, “Don’t you have a three-strikes and you’re out model for dealing with
performance or behavior issues?”
Not
every situation is going to fit into the same neat, tidy package. It is critical to consider of all the
issues and facts before making a decision and judgment cannot be factored out
of the decision-making process. Not all situations are the same and not all
employees are the same.
While
managers can’t expect a perfect algorithm for making employee decisions,
employees can’t expect to have everything spelled out for them – like the
employee who once said during a disciplinary meeting, “No one ever told me I
couldn’t do that.” They too must
exercise some judgment. Employee
accountability is the second critical factor in the equation.
Policies
should be management guidelines and not “cookbooks”. Managers need to recognize that while they must be
consistent in their approach to managing people, they have a say in the
decision-making process. Their
judgment matters. Don’t expect to
treat everyone “equally”, because not all situations and circumstances are
equal. You can’t expect to treat a
long-tenured employee with a good record, who happens to have a few missteps,
the same as you would treat someone who had been with the company a short time
and managed to build a disciplinary and negative performance history
quickly.
Treat
everyone with fairness and respect and most importantly, don’t factor judgment
out of the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment