When Pope Francis addressed the U.S. Congress in
September 2015, he used the word dialogue twelve times. The irony of his use of
that word struck me – “I want to take this opportunity to dialogue…” – since he
was delivering a speech to them – a one-way communication. Yet dialogue implies
a two-way communication, a conversation. Was he implying that there was not
enough conversation among the members of this leadership body or was it a subtle
suggestion that more two-way communication is needed in the world today? We
text, we tweet, we post – but we don’t talk!
We rely too much on electronic communication these
days. We push information out via e-mail, text messaging, and social media. All
of these media lack social interaction – body language, facial expressions, and
tone of voice. Since written communication is composed and not spontaneous,
there is no immediate feedback if the message is misinterpreted, produces an
unexpected response, or is never received. E-mail can be interactive, but it’s
time delayed and often frustrates the process of reaching a conclusion and
completing the feedback loop.
A casual conversation among three friends resulted
in one offering space at his company to the other two who wanted to hold a
simple networking event. He made the referral and introductions to the
appropriate individuals in his firm – all via e-mail. The introduction was
acknowledged by his colleague, and she subsequently advised the two friends
that there’d be more information. Imagine the two friends surprise upon
receiving an e-mail six weeks later from yet another staff member describing
the event planned for them. The simple meet-and-greet somehow morphed into a
formal event involving a presentation. When they finally had a phone call with
the colleague to whom they’d been introduced, the two friends discovered she was
clueless about the original request. Their request and the event had been blown
out of proportion. Several months and countless e-mails later, they all
realized that if a phone conversation had taken place initially, the confusion
and frustration they were all feeling would have been avoided.
While all generations in the workplace can be
equally guilty of heavy reliance on e-communication, the millennials are
particularly disadvantaged. Many of them never learned the art of conversation
at home. They grew up watching their parents on phones and devices and never
learned how to have face-to-face conversations. In today’s virtual workplaces,
the challenge to interact in-person becomes greater.
Good conversation is important. It’s the free flow
and exchange of information and ideas – where people openly and honestly
express opinions, share feelings, and articulate theories willingly, even when
ideas and theories are controversial or unpopular. People involved are aware of
what’s happening and what’s being said. Good conversation uses the follow
skills:
·
Attending skills to convey acknowledgement and recognition and to establish
ease.
·
Encouraging skills to help elaborate on thoughts or feelings.
·
Clarifying skills to reduce ambiguity and establish clarity.
·
Reflecting skills to restate, in your own words, what the other person
is saying.
Great dialogue leads to effective conversations.
Effective conversations have balance, maintain confidence and self-esteem and
build trust, integrity and constructive relationships. These are goals that all
leaders should embrace. Greater dialogue (and less texting, tweeting and
posting) moves everyone toward common, mutual interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment